2012 Chrysler 300C Pricing and Specs Released..

csv8 · 12-07-2012, 04:30 PM

The prices of the new 300C are similar to the G6 and Berlina. with better equipment levels. The 300C Luxury is priced with G6E and Calais.
The SRT is $66k... thats gotta hurt FPV and HSV..It will be interesting to see how sales go.
FIRST DRIVE VERDICT

Chrysler’s new 300 range delivers on the high expectations of new Fiat/Chrysler products. The range is vastly improved overall in performance, quality, efficiency, and value.

Whether the Australian market will embrace another large, rear-wheel-drive sedan remains to be seen, but there are definite highlights among the range that could put yet another dent in Falcon and Commodore sales.

At $66,000, the barnstorming SRT8 is a cheaper, more powerful, better equipped and likely faster alternative to FPV’s GT or the HSV Clubsport R8.

The diesel V6 is a nice drive, and delivers impressive economy considering the 300’s significant weight.

But, for $5000 less, we agree with Chrysler’s expectation that the petrol V6 will be the volume seller, and the eight-speed auto is a nice little bonus to boot.
http://www.themotorreport.com.au/545...e-in-australia

No.6 · 12-07-2012, 04:52 PM

Very nice car! ive always liked the look of the 300 range and this really improves upon it. But...the 300 range is (imo and others too) for 40+ year olds and not for the under 30's market...lol...where as the FPV's and HSV's suit all ages.

Pandemic · 12-07-2012, 05:06 PM

I'm hoping this is a start in more competitive prices across the range of vehicles in Australia, thus reducing the price gouging in Australia.

One can hope!

V3RSAC3 · 12-07-2012, 05:22 PM

I'm in love with my 300C and will definitely be upgrading to the new SRT8 with the 6.4Ltr. The thing that I don't like about them is that they don't have that "gangster" look that the previous model holds, but in all it's a far superior car packed with gadgets, and at 66k they're definitely giving Holden and Ford a run for their money.

bangm001 · 12-07-2012, 05:37 PM

Yeah looks good and at a reasonable price.

Can I tick a SRT8 version with a manual gearbox though?

I dont care how good the 8 speeder is I want manual...

irish2 · 12-07-2012, 05:41 PM

The SRT will be slower than the GT and possibly the HSV too. It might have more power on paper but it definately doesn't have the torque spread of the Falcon.

Edit: It is also 150kg's heavier than the GT. So less torque (in the lower rev range), similar power (we all know the GT has more than 335 at the fly) and more weight yet the journos think it will be faster

big_landau · 12-07-2012, 06:14 PM

im not so sure,we will have to wait until a few tests have been done but dont underestimate a 6.4L hemi.

Road_Warrior · 12-07-2012, 06:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by big_landau

im not so sure,we will have to wait until a few tests have been done but dont underestimate a 6.4L hemi.

Caradvice have done a review and said:

Quote:

Like: Strong engines including ripper V8; still looks cool; generally high level of standard equipment; rear view camera fitted to all models

Dislike: Cumbersome handling; busy ride; no leather seats in base model; diesel carries $5000 premium

big_landau · 12-07-2012, 06:27 PM

and ?

2011G6E · 12-07-2012, 07:26 PM

I'll have a diesel one, thanks...

staity · 12-07-2012, 09:15 PM

Sounds Good!!! the Missus has already hinted she wants one to replace the XR6, told her NO My ute gets the upgrade 1st. She didn't take that too well.

Rodge · 12-07-2012, 09:17 PM

Handling looks like it could be better and its a real porker in the weight department.
Car Advice review http://www.caradvice.com.au/181202/chrysler-300-review/

tranquilized · 12-07-2012, 09:50 PM

Not really my kinda car, too much of a barge. But it looks ok, except from the rear which is just horrible. I just cant get over the equipment levels - a lot of it was optional on 7 series BMW's and S Class Mercs a few years ago!

XtRmn8 · 12-07-2012, 09:56 PM

I love it. That is nice evolution of the original 300C.

That 8 speed ZF must be a cracker. The base model is 2100kg and with a 210kw/340Nm V6 if goes from 0-100km/h in 7 seconds flat. Combined consumption is also impressive at 9.5L/100kms.

Lot of kit even for the base 300 Limited.

BaraFGXR6 · 12-07-2012, 10:09 PM

Weight and handling will be an issue for some. Most will never use the car at a track or take it through a mountain pass so weight wont be considered.

jpd80 · 12-07-2012, 10:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rodge

Handling looks like it could be better and its a real porker in the weight department.
Car Advice review http://www.caradvice.com.au/181202/chrysler-300-review/

From Chrysler.com, the kerb weight for the SRT8 is 4365 lbs. or 1984 Kg...
the AWD SHO Taurus weighs about the same and probably performs the same too..

By comparison, our own XR6 Turbo with luxury pack looks an absolute bargain

**Polyal** · 12-07-2012, 11:05 PM

You cant compare a XR6T to any 300C...even in V6 form, its just not the same kind of car. If we had a G8E then perhaps...but we dont.

300C buyers couldnt give a fat rats about handling.

They look good, go well enough and break out from the crowd. They are also full of fruit and do the job they were designed for perfectly.

People comparing the handling to GT's etc are clutching at straws.

The only comparison to the SRT8 is perhaps the GTE...so then you need to look at the gizmo's etc that you get because at the end of the day they both go like stink. But from what I understand you save a fair bit of coin buying the Chrysler.

mik · 12-07-2012, 11:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Polyal

You cant compare a XR6T to any 300C...even in V6 form, its just not the same kind of car. If we had a G8E then perhaps...but we dont.

300C buyers couldnt give a fat rats about handling.

They look good, go well enough and break out from the crowd. They are also full of fruit and do the job they were designed for perfectly.

People comparing the handling to GT's etc are clutching at straws.

The only comparison to the SRT8 is perhaps the GTE...so then you need to look at the gizmo's etc that you get because at the end of the day they both go like stink. But from what I understand you save a fair bit of coin buying the Chrysler.

the front just looks wrong, but beauty is in the eye of the beholder, well have to agree to disagree on that one

.

SteveJH · 12-07-2012, 11:32 PM

Just remember that a Falcon will weigh 150-250kg less then the 300C.

Buntz · 12-07-2012, 11:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Polyal

You cant compare a XR6T to any 300C...even in V6 form, its just not the same kind of car. If we had a G8E then perhaps...but we dont.

300C buyers couldnt give a fat rats about handling.

They look good, go well enough and break out from the crowd. They are also full of fruit and do the job they were designed for perfectly.

People comparing the handling to GT's etc are clutching at straws.

The only comparison to the SRT8 is perhaps the GTE...so then you need to look at the gizmo's etc that you get because at the end of the day they both go like stink. But from what I understand you save a fair bit of coin buying the Chrysler.

Not that Australians really know a good car when they come across one, this Chrysler is loaded with tech and luxury for sure. Not that there is any car under that walrus. The 3.6L + 8 speed gearbox is the pick of the bunch in my mind, forget the V8. And at those prices, you can't really complain. But if you want a car that handles, it's still the Aussies. But if you want loads of tech, this car has the Aussies beat.

Quote:

Originally Posted by bangm001

Yeah looks good and at a reasonable price.

Can I tick a SRT8 version with a manual gearbox though?

I dont care how good the 8 speeder is I want manual...

They didn't mention it there, but if you check the specs on the US site, both 5.7L and 6.4L V8's come with 5 speed automatic transmissions. There are no Manual options. Still want it?

V3RSAC3 · 13-07-2012, 12:21 AM

Here's some pictures of it in the flesh from my local dealer. They got delivered today. Enjoy.

**janddbone** · 13-07-2012, 01:00 AM

Bloody beaut... How can you not like the rear? It would be the front i am not so keen on...

Cheese3 · 13-07-2012, 01:08 AM

Love it, might get one when it gets a better gearbox.

janddbtwo · 13-07-2012, 01:13 AM

when my boss gets it ill just have to borrow it haha

Buntz · 13-07-2012, 01:14 AM

My god that thing is ugly.

I hate those cheek bones. This is how you do cheek bones Chrysler:

It's got to be subtle.

chevypower · 13-07-2012, 01:43 AM

^^^^ i think everyone gets the idea. Anything that isn't a Falcon is ugly.

Wretched · 13-07-2012, 08:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cheese3

Love it, might get one when it gets a better gearbox.

Expected on the SRT next year.
The regular 300(c) already has the 8spd.
I took a ride in one a couple of weeks back.
The 8spd has a different gear selector to the 5spd. Very short.

MITCHAY · 13-07-2012, 08:59 AM

Looks good, well appointed, and decent pricing.

Rodge · 13-07-2012, 09:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tranquilized

Not really my kinda car, too much of a barge. But it looks ok, except from the rear which is just horrible. I just cant get over the equipment levels - a lot of it was optional at great cost on 7 series BMW's and S Class Mercs a few years ago!

Fixed that for ya....Yeah tell me about it...

Cherry Red colour looks good.

GQ_Smooth · 13-07-2012, 09:25 AM

Don't like the look. Speak to some previous Chrysler owners and ask how they like their Chrysler dealer service and support. If you think Ford is bad, wait for the flames. Unless people are Jeep diehard fans, Chrysler struggle to retain customers in Australia (the GFC didn't help). Unless they have invested a lot more money in local support, training and parts availability, prepair for a lot of complaints.

Great pricing and equipment list, if Falcons were made in the US, this is what we would get (with a 3.7V6 and 5.0V8).