Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 30-07-2008, 08:08 PM   #1
MoreHPformyXR6
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
MoreHPformyXR6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: FoMoCo
Posts: 3,441
Default Which ute pro's v con's FG XR8 v VE SS

Hi Guys

This is early days into my research probably 12 months down the track. But im fairly certain my next car will be a Ute. I know this is a ford forum so the answer's may be blue biased. I was hoping everyone who puts their 2cents in, will try to be as impartial as possible. I would be looking at getting a Ute purely as a recreational vehicle (I dont have any need for a work horse - if I did my choice would be far easier).

Im tossing up between the FG XR8 post Sept 2008 and the VE SS so both cars would have ESP. I would more than likley be getting an auto as I do a lot if inner city stop start driving. Now I know the VE Ute has sedan like suspension in the rear end which too me is a plus. But with the new FG Ute the rear end set up doesn't seem to get a bad write up from the car critics. I know the ZF 6 is a far superior box to the Holden. Can anyone tell me more about the auto in the holden or link me to any write ups etc. (I know basically zero about it). Id look to do basic mods down the track breathing mods and custom tune. Which make gives me more bang for my mod bucks?
Does the XR8 out rank the SS feature wise or vice versa etc?
I just created this thread as a general chit chat for AFF members as the pro's and con's of both vehicles and your unbiased input is welcomed. As I get further into my research I will probally raise a similar chat on LSI forum's.
:

Thanks & Cheers

Scott

__________________
FGX XR6 Lightning Strike Sedan

BA XR6 Mk II Shockwave Sedan - Now Sold - gone but not forgotten

mods: 20% under drive, Pacemaker Comps 4495' (ceramic coated) , 3' Metal Cat, XR6T exhaust - twin 3' tips, F6 CAI, K&N panel filter, PWR trans cooler, customed tuned by Heinrich Performance Tuning HPT 183.7rwkw.


Quote:
Originally Posted by ATMO SIX
You have become the new SLOANY mate, no real quality to your current post(s).

Last edited by MoreHPformyXR6; 30-07-2008 at 08:13 PM.
MoreHPformyXR6 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-07-2008, 08:13 PM   #2
burnz
VFII SS UTE
 
burnz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Central Coast
Posts: 6,353
Default

that's a tuff choise, L98 v's boss. and a weekend toy.
if you go the holden get the 6 speed manuel, dont bother with the auto.
__________________
I don't often hear the sound of a screaming LSX.
But when I do, So do the neighbours..
GO SOUTHS
burnz is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-07-2008, 08:18 PM   #3
b2tf
not here much anymore
 
b2tf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sthn NSW
Posts: 22,918
Default

Im half considering updating the ute and both of those are on the look-at list. In my opinion the VE looks better (but it is my opinion), however the XR will carry more and is more capable with loads etc. Gearbox and engine wise they are both on par and I think to decide you would need to drive them both - I'm yet to drive an FG but I did like the VE a lot.

Bang for your buck in terms of mods you can have a VE running 12 second passes for decent money if you so wish.
__________________
2024 F150 XLT
b2tf is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-07-2008, 08:20 PM   #4
Ives
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Ives's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Sydney, NSW
Posts: 2,368
Default

I believe the XR8 ute is the better car here. However, the SS looks better imo. I've seen a couple FG utes (XR6s and XR8s)... they look good from the front, but nothing special from the rear.
Ives is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-07-2008, 08:25 PM   #5
mad cow
blue oval addict
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: echuca
Posts: 571
Default

if you grab the latest issue of top gear magazine they take both of those utes for a fang into the outback. i cant tell you the results as ive only just got the magazine.
mad cow is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-07-2008, 08:27 PM   #6
4Vman
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
4Vman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 14,654
Default

If you're buying a ute as a ute its a no brainer... the Falcon load capacity and rear end alone is a winner.



__________________
335 S/C GT: The new KING of Australian made performance cars..
4Vman is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-07-2008, 08:32 PM   #7
MoreHPformyXR6
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
MoreHPformyXR6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: FoMoCo
Posts: 3,441
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 4Vman
If you're buying a ute as a ute its a no brainer... the Falcon load capacity and rear end alone is a winner.
If I was its a no brainer thats for sure. But it would be purley used for recreation and going two and from the office oh and maybe a bag or two of potting mix from bunnings may see the lined tray hehe

Quote:
Originally Posted by mad cow
if you grab the latest issue of top gear magazine they take both of those utes for a fang into the outback. i cant tell you the results as ive only just got the magazine.
Thanks for that will have to pop down to my newsagent in the next few days.
__________________
FGX XR6 Lightning Strike Sedan

BA XR6 Mk II Shockwave Sedan - Now Sold - gone but not forgotten

mods: 20% under drive, Pacemaker Comps 4495' (ceramic coated) , 3' Metal Cat, XR6T exhaust - twin 3' tips, F6 CAI, K&N panel filter, PWR trans cooler, customed tuned by Heinrich Performance Tuning HPT 183.7rwkw.


Quote:
Originally Posted by ATMO SIX
You have become the new SLOANY mate, no real quality to your current post(s).

Last edited by MoreHPformyXR6; 30-07-2008 at 08:37 PM.
MoreHPformyXR6 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-07-2008, 08:37 PM   #8
chubbz80
chubbz80
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Zeehan tas
Posts: 24
Default

the only thing that would move me to the other side to the ve ss would be the ugly join line in the xr6,8 utes have after the cab i understand that it can be a traytop as well but it looks like crap atleast the ss has a continuse shell but thats my opinion
chubbz80 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-07-2008, 08:48 PM   #9
Falcon Coupe
Clevo Mafia Inc.
 
Falcon Coupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 10,496
Chairman's Award: Chairman's Award - Issue reason: The exceptional contribution made to AFF over an extended period of time. Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Your tireless efforts behind the scenes in keeping AFF the place it is. 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 4Vman
If you're buying a ute as a ute its a no brainer... the Falcon load capacity and rear end alone is a winner.

Plus the auto is better and IMO the SS has nothing on the FG in looks.
Falcon Coupe is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-07-2008, 08:52 PM   #10
4Vman
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
4Vman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 14,654
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Falcon Coupe
Plus the auto is better and IMO the SS has nothing on the FG in looks.
Good points, plus the extra KW's.. actually come to think of it is there any reason why you'd even consider the SS...??



__________________
335 S/C GT: The new KING of Australian made performance cars..
4Vman is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-07-2008, 08:57 PM   #11
tex
Broken
 
tex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,845
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: With the exception of maybe HSE2, nobody writes a review like Texy. 
Default

My mates SSV last weekend cranked out 245 @ the rears! That from an advertised 270 @ the fly.

A GTS 300 VX same dyno, same day, next car on the dyno - ran up 240............

Go figure.

He's landed an absolute ball tearer, a freak,

or an SS with the HSV 307............................................... .........................
__________________
The Scud GT

11.4 @ 128, 1.88 60ft.
tex is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-07-2008, 08:58 PM   #12
xls3v
Regular Member
 
xls3v's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: adelaide
Posts: 260
Default

vz maloo with 6 speed
puts my 3v ba to shame
xls3v is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-07-2008, 09:00 PM   #13
tex
Broken
 
tex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,845
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: With the exception of maybe HSE2, nobody writes a review like Texy. 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by xls3v
vz maloo with 6 speed
puts my 3v ba to shame
Was it ever going to be the other way around?

Sorry, just don't see your point.
__________________
The Scud GT

11.4 @ 128, 1.88 60ft.
tex is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-07-2008, 09:02 PM   #14
Falcon Coupe
Clevo Mafia Inc.
 
Falcon Coupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 10,496
Chairman's Award: Chairman's Award - Issue reason: The exceptional contribution made to AFF over an extended period of time. Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Your tireless efforts behind the scenes in keeping AFF the place it is. 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tex
My mates SSV last weekend cranked out 245 @ the rears! That from an advertised 270 @ the fly.

A GTS 300 VX same dyno, same day, next car on the dyno - ran up 240............

Go figure.

He's landed an absolute ball tearer, a freak,

or an SS with the HSV 307............................................... .........................

My Clevo puts out 320kw at the rears, maybe he should buy an XD ute ?....or maybe there is more to it than dyno graphs.
Falcon Coupe is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-07-2008, 09:06 PM   #15
MoreHPformyXR6
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
MoreHPformyXR6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: FoMoCo
Posts: 3,441
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tex
My mates SSV last weekend cranked out 245 @ the rears! That from an advertised 270 @ the fly.
....
Auto or Manual?

Thanks for the input guy's as I said in my 1st post its more than likley id go auto due to what type of driving its used for plus im a shorty 170cm so I dont want to sit to close to the airbag which is always a consideration.
I just wonder if the six speed auto in the SS are any good or atleast ok etc?
Looks wise I like the look of both an VE SS Ute lowered with no mad spats looks hot and haven had a real close look at the FG XR8 ute as yet but from what ive seen it looks quite nice. Looks in a car is a big factor for me but I like them both I know what people mean with the gap in the Falcon ute between tub and cab. But thats neather here nor there for me (got over the gap in the Ford ute years ago). Plus anyone know of the top of there head what the auto's do 0-100km and quater mile (standard) for both camps?
__________________
FGX XR6 Lightning Strike Sedan

BA XR6 Mk II Shockwave Sedan - Now Sold - gone but not forgotten

mods: 20% under drive, Pacemaker Comps 4495' (ceramic coated) , 3' Metal Cat, XR6T exhaust - twin 3' tips, F6 CAI, K&N panel filter, PWR trans cooler, customed tuned by Heinrich Performance Tuning HPT 183.7rwkw.


Quote:
Originally Posted by ATMO SIX
You have become the new SLOANY mate, no real quality to your current post(s).
MoreHPformyXR6 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-07-2008, 09:13 PM   #16
drew`SEVNT5
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Chapel St
Posts: 774
Default

um, all those guys spouting the BS about load capacities...



sorry to burst your bubble, SS has more load cap.



Aaaand, in ute form, id take the SS/SSV ute over XR8, IMO it looks better, and it is a better motor....



Add the XR6T in the mix, and id go the blue oval..



Now, go to sedans, and its a different story...
__________________
Current

-2011 Nissan 370z Coupe (6M)-
-2006 Husqvarna SMRR450-
drew`SEVNT5 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-07-2008, 09:14 PM   #17
tex
Broken
 
tex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,845
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: With the exception of maybe HSE2, nobody writes a review like Texy. 
Default

Manual, with aftermarket air filter and rear resonators removed.

No other mods.
__________________
The Scud GT

11.4 @ 128, 1.88 60ft.
tex is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-07-2008, 09:14 PM   #18
3vXT
...
 
3vXT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,046
Default

If your not buying it to carry heavy stuff i'd probably go with the SS.
I think the holden utes have a history of being a little quicker around the twisty stuff while sacrificing load carrying abilities to the fords.

Personally, i like their V8 better too but i wouldn't trust their auto as much as the fords (so i'd get the manual).

In short if it were me, it would be a choice between a manual SS ute or an auto XR6T ute (and i have no idea what i'd pick ) Between the two you've mentioned though, it would have to be the SS.
3vXT is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-07-2008, 09:17 PM   #19
4Vman
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
4Vman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 14,654
Default

Can i ask why you're buying a ute if you don't plan on carrying stuff and using it as a ute??
Why not just buy a sedan!



__________________
335 S/C GT: The new KING of Australian made performance cars..
4Vman is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-07-2008, 09:18 PM   #20
plext
Forum Director
 
plext's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Boro
Posts: 1,187
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by drew`SEVNT5
um, all those guys spouting the BS about load capacities...



sorry to burst your bubble, SS has more load cap.



Aaaand, in ute form, id take the SS/SSV ute over XR8, IMO it looks better, and it is a better motor....



Add the XR6T in the mix, and id go the blue oval..



Now, go to sedans, and its a different story...
Yeah, course it does.......


plext is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-07-2008, 09:18 PM   #21
tex
Broken
 
tex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,845
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: With the exception of maybe HSE2, nobody writes a review like Texy. 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Falcon Coupe
My Clevo puts out 320kw at the rears, maybe he should buy an XD ute ?....or maybe there is more to it than dyno graphs.
Why would anyone buy an XD?

I personally wouldn't buy an SS, BUT, I personally believe that in his case, he's brought good bang for buck.

Thought everyone might get some interest out of that, but seems (in your case) I was wrong.

And yes, there is more to a vehicle than just dyno graphs. The comparo to the '300' GTS was more my point.

tex
__________________
The Scud GT

11.4 @ 128, 1.88 60ft.
tex is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-07-2008, 09:23 PM   #22
FlipXW
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,421
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by drew`SEVNT5
um, all those guys spouting the BS about load capacities...



sorry to burst your bubble, SS has more load cap.



Aaaand, in ute form, id take the SS/SSV ute over XR8, IMO it looks better, and it is a better motor....



Add the XR6T in the mix, and id go the blue oval..



Now, go to sedans, and its a different story...
The ability to make it a tonner is always there. Im pretty sure its load limited due to the 19inch wheels.
The FG has by far the better auto and interior. Also can be taken into consideration.
FlipXW is online now   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-07-2008, 09:26 PM   #23
apolloxbgt
cross breeder
 
apolloxbgt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: vic
Posts: 3,964
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tex
Why would anyone buy an XD?

WTF??Because they are tuff.
__________________
apolloxbgt is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-07-2008, 09:27 PM   #24
burnz
VFII SS UTE
 
burnz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Central Coast
Posts: 6,353
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tex
My mates SSV last weekend cranked out 245 @ the rears! That from an advertised 270 @ the fly.

A GTS 300 VX same dyno, same day, next car on the dyno - ran up 240............

Go figure.

He's landed an absolute ball tearer, a freak,

or an SS with the HSV 307............................................... .........................
the L98 has better torque curve than the LS1, and better than the LS2 for that matter.
__________________
I don't often hear the sound of a screaming LSX.
But when I do, So do the neighbours..
GO SOUTHS
burnz is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-07-2008, 09:29 PM   #25
drew`SEVNT5
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Chapel St
Posts: 774
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by plext
Yeah, course it does.......



Thats all well and good, but factory 'Max Payload' Figures are as such:

XR6T/XR8 Ute on 18" Wheels: 570kg
XR6T/XR8 Ute on 19" Wheels: 500kg


SS Manual: 617kg
SS Auto: 597kg

SSV Manual: 528kg
SSV Auto: 508kg


The numbers don't lie..
__________________
Current

-2011 Nissan 370z Coupe (6M)-
-2006 Husqvarna SMRR450-
drew`SEVNT5 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-07-2008, 09:30 PM   #26
pitpal
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
pitpal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,234
Default

Pretty sure theres nothing in it in regards to the quater. Couple of tenths
pitpal is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-07-2008, 09:37 PM   #27
tex
Broken
 
tex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,845
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: With the exception of maybe HSE2, nobody writes a review like Texy. 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by apolloxbgt
WTF??Because they are tuff.
OK.

If you say so.
__________________
The Scud GT

11.4 @ 128, 1.88 60ft.
tex is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-07-2008, 09:38 PM   #28
MoreHPformyXR6
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
MoreHPformyXR6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: FoMoCo
Posts: 3,441
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 4Vman
Can i ask why you're buying a ute if you don't plan on carrying stuff and using it as a ute??
Why not just buy a sedan!
You can ask for sure = I want to.
I love the look of the ute's always have so I say why not, id be buying it for purley for recreational enjoyment (selfish reasons I know hehe)
__________________
FGX XR6 Lightning Strike Sedan

BA XR6 Mk II Shockwave Sedan - Now Sold - gone but not forgotten

mods: 20% under drive, Pacemaker Comps 4495' (ceramic coated) , 3' Metal Cat, XR6T exhaust - twin 3' tips, F6 CAI, K&N panel filter, PWR trans cooler, customed tuned by Heinrich Performance Tuning HPT 183.7rwkw.


Quote:
Originally Posted by ATMO SIX
You have become the new SLOANY mate, no real quality to your current post(s).
MoreHPformyXR6 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-07-2008, 09:41 PM   #29
plext
Forum Director
 
plext's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Boro
Posts: 1,187
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by drew`SEVNT5
Thats all well and good, but factory 'Max Payload' Figures are as such:

XR6T/XR8 Ute on 18" Wheels: 570kg
XR6T/XR8 Ute on 19" Wheels: 500kg


SS Manual: 617kg
SS Auto: 597kg

SSV Manual: 528kg
SSV Auto: 508kg


The numbers don't lie..
Gee, you're right.

Guess I didn't get lot on there after all.

It's only the published figures that count people, ignore experience and follow Drew into the happy land of the numbers I got off the internet are the the only truth and light.

Join now!
plext is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 30-07-2008, 10:00 PM   #30
drew`SEVNT5
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Chapel St
Posts: 774
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by plext
Gee, you're right.

Guess I didn't get lot on there after all.

It's only the published figures that count people, ignore experience and follow Drew into the happy land of the numbers I got off the internet are the the only truth and light.

Join now!

Hahah..


I don't doubt you did....


I also know I have gotten a similar load on the back of my ve ute on 18's... as well as my mates au ute, both above the factory figures


Just saying, published figures are there for a reason, whether or not you(or I) choose to follow them, is another thing....technically, I am correct...the best kind of correct(thank you, futurama)

Good work on the sarcasm, too...

I imagine a retort in a similar style to your good self, the admin, would have one out on ones ?
__________________
Current

-2011 Nissan 370z Coupe (6M)-
-2006 Husqvarna SMRR450-
drew`SEVNT5 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 12:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL