Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > Club and Speciality Forums > Forum Community Car Clubs > AU Falcon.com.au

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 18-04-2007, 12:01 PM   #1
REDAUXR6II
Regular Member
 
REDAUXR6II's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 394
Default Stroker question

Now I am a bit confused, with stroker kits what is the equivalent in engine size, eg 5.0L 5.4L 5.6L etc

and what is a 347 equivalent to?

and what kit would you get to make an XR8 5.0L into a 5.6L?

Cheers,

REDAUXR6II is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-04-2007, 12:37 PM   #2
Mechan1k
Moderator
Donating Member1
 
Mechan1k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Kenthurst
Posts: 40,394
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Brings a wealth of knowledge to the forums and is frequently giving helpful advice. Technical Contributor: For members who share their technical expertise. - Issue reason: Always willing to help out with technical information. 
Default

I am pretty sure 347 is equivalent to 5.6L.

Can tell I am not an 8 owner ... as that isn't a definitely answer ... but the numbers seem close to me.
Mechan1k is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-04-2007, 12:50 PM   #3
james22
With da Warlords
 
james22's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Orange NSW
Posts: 1,781
Default

spot on the head, 347cu is 5.6L
__________________
You don't have to be faster than the bear, you just have to be faster than the slowest guy running from the bear.

For Sale: Parachute. Only used once, never opened, small stain.

Windsor Warlords
AU III XR-8220
300+ rwhp of Manual fun

XR50T Ute - 300rwkw (give or take depending on the day)
james22 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-04-2007, 01:16 PM   #4
b2tf
not here much anymore
 
b2tf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sthn NSW
Posts: 22,918
Default

T3's were 5.6 and 342ci
__________________
2024 F150 XLT
b2tf is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-04-2007, 01:30 PM   #5
james22
With da Warlords
 
james22's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Orange NSW
Posts: 1,781
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by b2tf
T3's were 5.6 and 342ci
Tomato - Tomatoe, Austin your a smartass :voldar02:
__________________
You don't have to be faster than the bear, you just have to be faster than the slowest guy running from the bear.

For Sale: Parachute. Only used once, never opened, small stain.

Windsor Warlords
AU III XR-8220
300+ rwhp of Manual fun

XR50T Ute - 300rwkw (give or take depending on the day)
james22 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-04-2007, 01:44 PM   #6
mcflux
Banned
Donating Member1
 
mcflux's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 8,303
Default

342ci = 5604cc (342*2.54^3)
347ci = 5686cc (347*2.54^3)
mcflux is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-04-2007, 02:48 PM   #7
xr8ute
Back on the road
 
xr8ute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Wollongong, NSW
Posts: 3,205
Default

As Ghia5L said...

342ci is approx 5.6L, and assumes a 3.40" stroke and a 4.00" bore.

347ci is approx 5.7L, and assumes a 3.40" stroke and a 4.03" bore (i.e. 30 thou oversize)
__________________
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

AU XR8 Ute 13.90 @ 100mph - http://www.aufalcon.com/xr8ute
5L Windsor, GT40X heads, Crane 2030, Pacey 4-1s, Lukey 3", 3.91:1, auto. Tuned by me w/Quarterhorse and BinaryEditor.

Coming Soon: Ported lower intake, Tickford "Premium" Brakes, and a good wash.
xr8ute is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-04-2007, 03:15 PM   #8
howesy
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
howesy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 581
Default

what an age old argument.
All the values can vary depending on whether you work it out on the bore and stroke of an engine or the actual vloume say for instance when using deep dish pistons and then do you use 22 / 7ths , 3.142 or the calculator value for Pi when working the volumes. They call it a 347 stroker kit because thats the capacity of the kit. at std bore it is 342cu/i approx. and at 30 thou over bore it is approx.
347 cu/i. pull any engine down and CC it and work out the math and I don't reckon there is an engine on the market that is exactly what they say it is. it's all generalising so whats all the fuss about be proud of your Ford and if Ford , FPV and Tickford all quote the capacity as 347 then as far as I'm concerned I'm proud to advertise it as such but if you all want to play down the size of your engine even in the interest of pedandic accuracy then thats up to you. proud to display my 347 stroker badges but as yet haven't found any 342 stroker badges yet.
All in good fun so please take it light heartedly guys.
howesy is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-04-2007, 03:58 PM   #9
JC
Miami Pilot
Donating Member2
 
JC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: ACT
Posts: 21,703
Tech Writer: Recognition for the technical writers of AFF - Issue reason: Writing tech articles 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by howesy
what an age old argument.
All the values can vary depending on whether you work it out on the bore and stroke of an engine or the actual vloume say for instance when using deep dish pistons and then do you use 22 / 7ths , 3.142 or the calculator value for Pi when working the volumes. They call it a 347 stroker kit because thats the capacity of the kit. at std bore it is 342cu/i approx. and at 30 thou over bore it is approx.
347 cu/i. pull any engine down and CC it and work out the math and I don't reckon there is an engine on the market that is exactly what they say it is. it's all generalising so whats all the fuss about be proud of your Ford and if Ford , FPV and Tickford all quote the capacity as 347 then as far as I'm concerned I'm proud to advertise it as such but if you all want to play down the size of your engine even in the interest of pedandic accuracy then thats up to you. proud to display my 347 stroker badges but as yet haven't found any 342 stroker badges yet.
All in good fun so please take it light heartedly guys.
Yeh, right. Get stuck in and then finish with this "All in good fun so please take it light heartedly guys" and you expect no reaction?

The 351 is often quoted as 5.8, but is in fact more than that. Historically, The badges ford used were always one (small) size up from Holden. (350/351, 5.7/5.8 etc). given that 351 is 5.8, then it follows that 347 is 5.6.

Either way, you're better off with a 454!
__________________
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The Hammer: FG GTE | 376rwkw | 1/4 mile 11.793 @ 119.75mph 1.733 60' (4408lb)
1 of 60 FG MK1 335 GTEs (1 of 118 FG Mk 1 & 2 335 GTEs).
Mods: Tune, HSD/ShockWorks, black GT335 19” staggered replicas with 245 & 275/35/19 Michelin Pilot sport 5s

Daily: BF2 Fairmont Ghia I6 ZF, machine face GT335 19” staggered Replicas with 245s and 275s, Bilsteins & Kings

FPV 335 build stats: <click here>

Ford Performance Club ACT
JC is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-04-2007, 04:14 PM   #10
mcflux
Banned
Donating Member1
 
mcflux's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 8,303
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JC
Either way, you're better off with a 454!
Or a 460 :
mcflux is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-04-2007, 04:24 PM   #11
JC
Miami Pilot
Donating Member2
 
JC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: ACT
Posts: 21,703
Tech Writer: Recognition for the technical writers of AFF - Issue reason: Writing tech articles 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ghia5L
Or a 460 :
ROFL, or a 7.6 litre!
__________________
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The Hammer: FG GTE | 376rwkw | 1/4 mile 11.793 @ 119.75mph 1.733 60' (4408lb)
1 of 60 FG MK1 335 GTEs (1 of 118 FG Mk 1 & 2 335 GTEs).
Mods: Tune, HSD/ShockWorks, black GT335 19” staggered replicas with 245 & 275/35/19 Michelin Pilot sport 5s

Daily: BF2 Fairmont Ghia I6 ZF, machine face GT335 19” staggered Replicas with 245s and 275s, Bilsteins & Kings

FPV 335 build stats: <click here>

Ford Performance Club ACT
JC is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-04-2007, 04:39 PM   #12
xr8ute
Back on the road
 
xr8ute's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Wollongong, NSW
Posts: 3,205
Default

But my honda-matic riceburner has more hp/ci than your dinosaur bogan V8....LOL :P


Howesy, piston "dish" has no affect on displacement. But the rest of your argument is spot-on.
__________________
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

AU XR8 Ute 13.90 @ 100mph - http://www.aufalcon.com/xr8ute
5L Windsor, GT40X heads, Crane 2030, Pacey 4-1s, Lukey 3", 3.91:1, auto. Tuned by me w/Quarterhorse and BinaryEditor.

Coming Soon: Ported lower intake, Tickford "Premium" Brakes, and a good wash.
xr8ute is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 18-04-2007, 04:50 PM   #13
howesy
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
howesy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 581
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JC
Yeh, right. Get stuck in and then finish with this "All in good fun so please take it light heartedly guys" and you expect no reaction?
off with a 454!
Always finish off that way because while I usually don't take things too seriously I can't always tell if others do so it's good to just remind people it's just one persons opinion, as significant or insignificant as it may seem to others.
Cheers.
howesy is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 02:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL