|
|
|
|
|
|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
|||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
24-11-2007, 12:39 PM
|
#1 | ||
|
DUB
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 368
|
hey, i have recently got a 2.5" cat-back exhaust installed into my 2000 model AU Falcon and i am wondering if i would be getting any extra power. i think that a stock engine produces 157Kw of power. would any one no how much extra power i would be getting now?
cheers |
||
|
|
|
24-11-2007, 01:04 PM
|
#2 | ||
|
Spin 'em Habib !
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Cranbourne Victoria
Posts: 3,854
|
Had mine done last year, Stock was 104.9kw and then made it to 120.2kw after the 2.5" Frogspec Exhaust was chucked on
anything from 10 - 15 kws is a bonus
__________________
AU2PWR |
||
|
|
|
|
24-11-2007, 01:13 PM
|
#3 | ||
|
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Can Do Land
Posts: 332
|
When I fitted a redback system to my ELXR6 the power difference was negligible.
What made a reasonable difference were Pacemaker headers and a CAI. If you are looking for a few more ponies headers are a must, imo they are a worthwhile mod with the Ford 6, made the vehicle a bit more responsive but don't expect to much. Hope this is of some help to you. |
||
|
|
|
|
24-11-2007, 06:43 PM
|
#4 | |||
|
not here much anymore
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sthn NSW
Posts: 22,918
|
Quote:
__________________
RAM 1500
|
|||
|
|
|
|
25-11-2007, 02:20 PM
|
#5 | |||
|
DUB
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 368
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
25-11-2007, 02:27 PM
|
#6 | ||
|
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,981
|
I'm guessing AU2PWR got a full exhaust, You won't get any gains at all with a cat back because you still have the same restiction of the factory exhaust manifold and stock cat.
|
||
|
|
|
|
25-11-2007, 05:40 PM
|
#7 | ||
|
Spin 'em Habib !
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Cranbourne Victoria
Posts: 3,854
|
mine was only cat back ..
__________________
AU2PWR |
||
|
|
|
|
25-11-2007, 06:06 PM
|
#8 | ||
|
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,981
|
thats an impresive result for a cat back exhaust, I didn't think there would be any gains. As I said before, I thought the exhaust manifold and cat would be more rextrictive, so you wouldn't get any gains unless they were replaced first
|
||
|
|
|
|
25-11-2007, 06:14 PM
|
#9 | ||
|
Spin 'em Habib !
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Cranbourne Victoria
Posts: 3,854
|
the cat is the Most restrictive thing i thought .. when i took mine out .. i mean err .. replaced it . the car revved heaps more and felt even more powerfull , then the power jumped another 10kws witht he extractors
__________________
AU2PWR |
||
|
|
|
|
25-11-2007, 06:16 PM
|
#10 | ||
|
Audi S3
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Sydney.
Posts: 8,307
|
on autotech's dyno last year, chiefs stock au pulled about 103 rwkw. mine with just a cat back pulled 117.
now it pulls 125rwkw lol
__________________
|
||
|
|
|
2.5" cat-back
Linear Mode
