![]() |
|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#31 | ||
Straight Eight
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 2,049
|
I think that Ford need to start toying with some premium price options... like an 8 speed gear box.
If people will pay more to use less... then they could sell a few of those.
__________________
The Falcon is dead. Long live the Mighty Falcon. |
||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#32 | |||
Regular Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 290
|
Quote:
Why is it that high-end diesels are always referred when trying to prove they are so good? I could refer to a Bugatti Veyron to prove how good petrols are, but it's obviously pointless. A TD from Audi, BMW, or Mercedes would double Falcon's price. Comparing apples with apples, Caradvice by far preferred the RWD petrol Terry over any of the Diesels. The same would be the case with the Falcon, were it available. Fuel economy difference? There was only 2L/100km difference, the petrol using just over 10L/100, despite the fact the engines were in a heavy car (petrol is supposed to be thirsty under load?) So yes, in reality its hard to justify the advantage of owning a diesel version of the Falcon. For Ford to produce one would make a lot of sense, as there are many diesel die-hards who would buy it just because it has a turbo-diesel. In case you hadn't noticed, I would not be craving for one.
__________________
2012 Ford Kuga Titanium (Mars Red) * 5 spd auto * ~170 000km odo * Mods: Fox cat-back exhaust, Simota CAI, larger intercooler, Spider iMode chip-tuning plug in. Engine responds very well to mods, but auto gearbox can become unsettled trying to cope with the extra torque. Good fuel economy overall: 9-12L/100km city, 8L/100 country. |
|||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#33 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,277
|
Quote:
of diesels is because of their tight NOX emission limits which requires expensive exhaust after treatment to comply. Adding that to the diesel premium makes the equation unworkable and turbo DI Petrol engines far easier to work with. It will be interesting to see what happens with European diesels when they have to meet Euro 6 in a few years, many are predicting that manufacturers will hit an economic wall as expensive Urea after treatment adds extra cost to engines and negates any advantage they had with running costs over DI turbo petrol engines. Last edited by jpd80; 29-05-2011 at 06:12 PM. |
|||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#34 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,277
|
I also noticed that the AWD I-6 Territory is no more, maybe it's because
12.5 l/100 km doesn't cut it anymore against 11.5 l/100 km competition. Perhaps I'm looking at Ford's technology adoption the wrong way around, the government gave Ford $40 million to develop vehicles to support the three different engine strategies: V6 diesel, I-6 EcoLPI and Ecoboost I-4. It may be a case of establishing a technology beach head with government funding and then extending those applications as market needs dictate. |
||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#35 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,077
|
Quote:
THEY HAVE NOT BEEN SOLD..... |
|||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#36 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,277
|
When human beings are lead by their emotions, they can make strange choices.
|
||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#37 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,077
|
Quote:
|
|||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#38 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: ACT
Posts: 4,028
|
Quote:
|
|||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#39 | ||
Where to next??
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 8,893
|
Didn't someone a few weeks ago post that diesel has just overtaken petrol as the most popular fuel being sold?
I personally do think that Falcon could have benefited from a diesel. |
||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#40 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,077
|
Quote:
I work with quite a number of car dealers and outside the 4WDs diesels are better than hybrids but not by all that much. Everyone seems to fixate on the price of fuel and usage. A few years ago I did the sums on the difference between a diesel landcruiser and petrol landcruiser while sitting at a Toyota dealer waiting for some server updates to finish. It worked out at the time that it would have taken 450,000km before the difference in the cost of fuel squared up the cost of the vehicles and that was not taking into account the horrendously expensive diesel services. When I asked the sales manager why anyone bought diesel he replied the same reason people by stripes on the cars (I was in my GT-P at the time), because it makes them feel good..... |
|||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#41 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,277
|
Quote:
I'm wondering about "herd mentality", will the mob be spooked enough by higher fuel prices to run off demanding diesel options without considering the cost of ownership and justifying the purchase by imagining a higher residual value... |
|||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#42 | ||
Thailand Specials
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Centrefold Lounge
Posts: 49,030
|
Maybe people like the way diesel drives?
I know I prefer my TDCI Focus over the NA 2L 4 cylinder petrol models. |
||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#43 | ||
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 9,292
|
V8's make very little sense too but funny how some of those against a Diesel have a V8 parked in their drive way.
Pretty simple - dont like Diesel - dont buy it nor whinge about the costs of keeping one. |
||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#44 | |||
Regular Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 290
|
Quote:
I would also prefer the TDCI in your case. It's a much stronger engine. Focus ECOboost on the other hand...
__________________
2012 Ford Kuga Titanium (Mars Red) * 5 spd auto * ~170 000km odo * Mods: Fox cat-back exhaust, Simota CAI, larger intercooler, Spider iMode chip-tuning plug in. Engine responds very well to mods, but auto gearbox can become unsettled trying to cope with the extra torque. Good fuel economy overall: 9-12L/100km city, 8L/100 country. |
|||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#45 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,077
|
Quote:
Oh and V8s would only be seen in museums....... |
|||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#46 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,127
|
Diesel are more efficient engine design when compared to spark ignition engine. When force fed they produce excellent torque and combine well with automatic transmission . Automatics are tranny of choice in Oz.
Falcon with a decent 6cyl diesel would expand Falcon customer base. Even Taxi industry would buy them. |
||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#47 | |||
Straight Eight
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 2,049
|
Quote:
Diesels sell because of the perceived benefits. But they are costly to service, mostly because they almost all include turbos. LPG is Ford's answer. And to spearhead that strike, I think adding an NA LPG 4 cyl donk along side the EcoBoost will make Falcon more attractive.
__________________
The Falcon is dead. Long live the Mighty Falcon. |
|||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#48 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,277
|
Quote:
As soon as fuel prices eased all the apocalyptic ravings stopped those gauges magically disappeared.... Performance always finds a way back, mostly because people still want it and some will pay handsomely for it. |
|||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#49 | ||
IWCMOGTVM Club Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern Suburbs Melbourne
Posts: 17,798
|
I could see a Diesel Falcon ute more popular then the sedan. Problem is the cost to get the V6 (cause it would be the one from the Terri) into the sedan will cost big. I guess if they had have got the duratec petrol in it would be more cost effective.
But Ford has come out and said that they don't see that big of a market for the sedan as opposed to the SUV market which diesel sales make up 50% of the market.
__________________
Daniel |
||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#50 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,047
|
Quote:
technical arguments aside, Ford needs to follow the market, not try and convince buyers to shift their thinking. |
|||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#51 | |||
Regular Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 290
|
Quote:
All that LPG has needed is for the technology to catch up, and now it has, making it a more favourable option than diesel. The buying public do generally want what's best, and it shouldn't take too long for them to realise that in Aus, it's LPG. Think of why there was a shift to diesel in the first place - then work out what the next shift might be: Could there be a movement away from diesel in favour of LPG? I am sure the case for diesel will weaken over time, esp. as it becomes more expensive to run (e.g. urea injection).
__________________
2012 Ford Kuga Titanium (Mars Red) * 5 spd auto * ~170 000km odo * Mods: Fox cat-back exhaust, Simota CAI, larger intercooler, Spider iMode chip-tuning plug in. Engine responds very well to mods, but auto gearbox can become unsettled trying to cope with the extra torque. Good fuel economy overall: 9-12L/100km city, 8L/100 country. |
|||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#52 | |||
IWCMOGTVM Club Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern Suburbs Melbourne
Posts: 17,798
|
Quote:
LPG (at this current point in time) is not the most economical everywhere in Australia (mind you it is in the largest portion of the market). The future will show how our fuel preference will be viewed. But seeing as China are planning on moving away from Australia in about 10 years it may become the best choice. Or as a free market it will become quite expensive. But all car companies need to keep their options open for different markets.
__________________
Daniel |
|||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#53 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 296
|
Would i be right in saying that most people that really dislike diesel are the people that call themselves performance car enthusiasts?
This is what is to be disliked about diesel: a diesel car is slower compared to the petrol equivalent, but the gap isnt as large as it used to be and infact many diesels can now be considered fast. also diesels dont sound as nice to car enthusiasts and often sound like a truck. but that is also changing with technological improvement, there are very quiet diesels available now, and with alloy technology and higher rev limits that keep coming, some of the newer diesels actually sound quite nice to people who like mechanical noise. also there is the feel of throttle control, many turbo diesels dont provide good feedback to the driver through the right foot, their is a feeling of lag and electronic control and you dont feel as direct with the throttle as a petrol car, but then again this also applies to some turbo-petrol cars. For drivers who drive sedately on public roads (the majority), the great torque is more desirable to most people not interested in racing their engines. modern diesels are leisurely, much like v8s were a few decades ago compared to there 4 and 6 cylinder counterparts. Diesel is now also closing the performance gap, it can work well in sports cars, just look at the last 5 years in lemans motoracing where audi and peugeout Turbo Diesels have beaten every single petrol engined lemans car (at less then half the engine rpm). What impresses me most about diesel is the technological advances of the engines in the past 20 years, the engine spec numbers suggest there has been much more advance in diesel engines then petrol engines. for that reason they are becoming desirable, they are actually seen as cutting edge technology by many people now. in the last 30 years fords I6 has increased torque from about 300nm to about 400nm, and power from about 110kw to 195kw. while in the same time many car companies that offered diesels that made 45kw and 200nm now make 125kw and 400nm with the same capacity. AND offer better low end torque and better economy then petrol equivalents. (the I6 / TD comparison is just based on commuter cars, not things like XR6Turbo as most TD cars dont offer performance versions, but they might soon) You must admit, a 2.2L kia making more torque and much better economy then the great Ford I6 is bloody impressive. Another great thing Ford could do is make a small capacity I6 direct injection with turbo. Holden is going to build a 2.8 turbo v6 commodore with higher power and torque then the ford 4l and also much better fuel economy. lets see how the direct injection turbo 4cyl falcon goes, i think they should have at least used a v6 direct injection turbo if they want to go down this route, they need to try to compete with holden not try to distance themselves from them. |
||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#54 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,277
|
Quote:
then they will bump the price up to protect their own income, just like diesel. The other problem with LPG is that it creates far more CO2 than diesel due to the amount of fuel consumed, if the government is serious about carbon reduction they should be steering people away from LPG not towards it. |
|||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#55 | |||
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 776
|
Quote:
You can confirm this idea by looking at the grams of co2/km consumption for the factory equipped lpg gas vehicles, though in practice with engines that aren't optimised for lpg(still run petrol as well) the figures are only about 2-3% better You are confusing the volume of lpg used with its carbon content and energy value. Its a less dense fuel than petrol, therefore more volume is used to go the same distance as petrol. However, when the mass of lpg versus the mass of petrol used in fuel consumption, lpg uses less, lpg has slightly more energy per kg. |
|||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#56 | ||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hervey Bay
Posts: 5,213
|
Go back and read the comments Ford made about diesel in a Falcon in their press releases.
Market research simply said the average buyer WOULD NOT pay the extra $3000 to $4000 for a diesel over the base petrol equivalent. That would mean an XT Falcon would have an RRP of around $43k. Then add the extra fuel costs and higher servicing costs. Performance is not the issue, money is. But if the buyer had the option of a $600 advanced gas system or a no cost 4 cylinder engine, they would take it up. Servicing costs would be the same and they'd spend less on fuel. 95% of Aussies, and yes I'm including most of you here, talk big, but in reality your wallets are full of dust and cobwebs. Tis the reason why there are more than 10,000 Great Wall crap boxes on our roads already, with another 10,000 expected to be sold this year. Money does the talking. Ford can't afford to spend the $$$ on a diesel Falcon on dreamers, knowing the uptake would be similar to the XR8 of old. Besides, most Aussies treat their cars like crap. Servicing and repairs usually take second place to everything else. An I6 can take a raping and come through squeaky clean. Can a modern diesel, with all its advanced emission requirements, do the same thing. One of the ladies here at work had a diesel Mondeo. The car spent too much of its time complaining about emissions problems and particulate filters needing a clean. She was more than happy to see it sold. I'm all for Ford doing something that will lengthen the longevity of the Falcon model in Australia. But its got to be something the average buyer wants and will pay for. Last edited by arm79; 30-05-2011 at 12:42 PM. |
||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#57 | |||
No longer a Uni student..
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Coffs Harbour, NSW
Posts: 2,557
|
Quote:
|
|||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#58 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,730
|
Quote:
__________________
2011 FG XR6 Sedan |
|||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#59 | ||
Life is a Ride!
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Baldivis, WA
Posts: 675
|
Funny read.
Diesel isn't for everyone, but should be offered as an option. Why Falcon diesel? Some people just want a Falcon. We have Mondeo diesel? Some people prefer a larger car with a larger engine, even diesel lovers. Diesel isn't worth the cost over petrol? Neither is the cost of owning a V8 or other high performance car in a country where you get treated as an axe murderer when you speed. They prob cost more to purchase, use more fuel, cost more in service and a diesel will last longer and return more resale. Plus any of the nay sayers ever driven a modern diesel passenger vehicle? Let alone a high performance one or dare I say a tuned TDI? Yes diesel in Europe is cheaper but the cost of purchasing a diesel over petrol is much higher so are road cost.
__________________
![]() Lowered, 19" Typhoon R-Specs, Tint, Mats, JL C2600.2 Splits, JL C2600, JL XD400/4 and JBL 12" Sub, 256RWKW...for now! ![]() ![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#60 | |||
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hervey Bay
Posts: 5,213
|
Quote:
I'm also to understand that heavy stop start traffic can cause the same issue. I remember reading about a Jag long term tester in Wheels. Cant remember if it was the 2.7 or 3.0 V6. But the journo got the warning just driving around Sydney, to and from work. He checked the manual which said "he MUST do at least 100km of freeway driving to try and clear the filter, and if the warning remained, back to the dealer". So he had to spend a day taking the car on a long drive to try fix it. He also called a dealer and was told that should the filter not clear, it's not covered by warranty. It's a consumable... And the repair bill would be between $400 and $1000, depending on exactly what was required. Now, as the typical Aussie owner of a diesel Falcon, who expects the thing to take him wherever he wants rain, hail or shine after getting it serviced every 40,000km, I dare say this kind of requirement wouldnt go over to well. Would damage the reputation of the car even more. It might be a typical part of of the SUV/4WD and prestige vehicle ownership experience... And its just accepted. But it wouldn't be accepted as part of the supposed rugged and reliable family hack image we expect from a Falcon. I know its off topic here, but I think the Falcons we drive now are far too advanced and techy compared to what the average buyer wants. ZF 6 speeds are awesome, but I wonder if the average buyer knows its costs $1000 to service and flush the oil when they buy the car. Or that spark plugs are $20 each. Or if you chip/scratch the alloy lower control arm, its unservicable and dangerous and needs to be replaed at the cost of $500 per side. Or the offset of their pretty alloy wheels allows them to buckle easily. Or the front discs on an XR6T/G6ET are something like $280 a side. It's the kind of expense i'd expect in something BMW or Merc. Last edited by arm79; 30-05-2011 at 01:19 PM. |
|||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |